On page 148, after detailing the myriad issues that she ran
into with regards to how she was dressed under the regime Marjane Satrapi
recounts, “The regime had understood that one person leaving her house while
asking herself: Are my trousers long enough? Is my veil in place?...No longer
asks herself: Where is my freedom of thought? Where is my freedom of speech?..”
The panel shows a worried Marjane leaving her house. This, for me, summed up the
message of Persepolis 2; how is a cultured, intellectual and independent young
woman supposed to return to her country to live normally when a horrific regime
has taken over that continually enforces asinine rules to distract women from
their loss of basic rights?
Being born in America, I’ve definitely become familiar with
the argument that in the West we put too much emphasis on the superficial,
making us a vapid and shallow culture focused on aesthetics. Even though there
are those that hold that opinion, it doesn’t affect me. I can choose to present
myself however I want to, be affectionate however I want to, wear make up or
not wear make up. Reading Marjane’s story enlightens one to the inner landscape
of someone who is not just told what to wear, but hounded endlessly about her
appearance. The psychological impact of that kind of oppression must be
immeasurable. Satrapi does a clear contrast between her adolescence abroad and
her eventual return to Iran. Satrapi endures teenage rights of passage abroad
(her first romance, illict partying, etc.) before returning to a home where her
contemporaries have not even had those experiences, being too busy with war,
violence, and especially for women, an incredible vigilant and oppressive eye
from the government.
Also what struck me
about the second installment of Persepolis was when Marjane is at university
and she helps the administration design new headscarves. It’s like to keep any
sort of normalcy from her previous European life she has to barter for freedom
in the form of inches of the headscarves they have to wear. It must feel
strange to have your education run be fundamentalist wack jobs, and she has to
pander to them every step of the way, from admission to graduation.
Satrapi is correct in saying that a context of fear cancels
out any other thoughts one may have about one’s own liberty. The women
surrounding Marjane after her return from Europe have gotten swept up in
finding husbands and conforming to the regime, because after all the
browbeating and policing there is nothing left to focus on but those things;
I’m not saying there aren’t other cultural cues at play, but to eliminate basic
rights can drastically narrow one’s focus.
The staging of Marjane’s return is effective in part because
the reader finds out in with Marjane what has happened in Iran while she was
abroad. Marjane’s experiences abroad with the kids in her school (and even the
nuns!) gives insight into how outsiders feel about Iran, and when Marjane
returns to find Iran in the state it is, war torn and dramatically oppressed,
we are as shocked as she is because she has not heard anything specific from
her parents. I know we’re not supposed to talk about whether we like the book
or not, but I didn’t want Persepolis 2 to end. I love Satrapi’s voice and
fearlessness.
Hi Trinidad,
ReplyDeleteNice job addressing "superficialities such as the veil, makeup, etc. deflecting from serious questions concerning freedom, quality of life, war, etc. (see page 148)"
Margaret S.
Trinidad,
ReplyDeletethe clothing becomes symbolic of not only the governmental policies but how different her life had become from her previous life in iran and her life in Europe.
Trying to be empathetic with this oppression does bring you closer to character and the evidence of change
e