Satrapi’s story embodies parallelism in how it juxtaposes a
coming of age tale and a rough political situation. Being a thirteen-year-old
girl is hard enough, and there are many narratives that depict solely that
dynamic as a main source of action. In Saratapi’s tale the protagonist’s family
is surrounded by a turmoil that terrorizes them every day of their lives. They
are soaking in a culture that regresses and decides to become fundamentalist,
is war torn and favors ruthless violence. As Marjane and her family and friends
try to deal with the imposition of ridiculous laws, Marjane is coming of age
and becoming the outspoken woman that she is, fantasizing about being a prophet
and dressing against the regime.
There is something to be said about the context of this
tale; it is a narrative that would not have fascinated (or been made into a
movie) if it had been set in a peaceful context. Marjane’s teenage rebellion is
not the standard teenage rebellion of illicit piercings and underage drinking,
people in her family are being executed for their political beliefs and her home
city is being bombed by Iraq.
To parallel Marjane’s home situation with that of us in the
states is to see drastic differences. Saratapi uses vignettes from her
childhood to piece together a behind the scenes look at a family that is well
aware what is going on around them is madness. In the states, the ideas we are
fed about Iran often revolve around its fundamentalist proclivities, news often
involving bombs and violence or talking about anti American sentiments. In our
day to day life it is easy to take that news as truth and forget to look
beyond; it is easy to reduce one’s viewpoint of Iran to just the extremes and
not take into account how varied the population is, and the fact that many do
not agree with the country’s politics. Persepolis in its entirety felt like the
kind of story that never gets told.
What struck me the most was the parallel between all the
upsetting and tragic political situations going on and Marjane’s burgeoning
outspokenness. The book starts with Marjane being a little kid who has
nontraditional fantasies about being a prophet and finishes with her being an
assertive adolescent who talks back to her teachers and talks openly about her
government’s lies. Marjane’s openness is effective in how it causes tension
between Marjane, her parents, and the outside world. This tension facilitates
communication of situations that are tense to begin with. For example, when the
regime takes over and Marjane’s school makes her wear a headscarf, participate
in pro war political assemblies, and spouts propaganda, the tension is created
in how Marjane’s entire world shifts and regresses. Marjane was not born into a
world that was the way it is when the book ends; in the beginning Marjane is in
a secular school. I will say that using a brave little girl as a storyteller
for such a tense and awkwardly shifting political situation is effective, if
only for that fact that I want to listen to little girl Marjane. Reading the
black and white panels, you get angry with her. This is the first of the graphic
novels we’ve read that I’ve forgotten I was reading a graphic novel, or looking
at pictures at all. The complex nature of the narrative, and its parallels
between growing up angst and political turmoil keep you enthralled enough in
the storyline that you forget the aesthetics.
When did "you get angry with her"? Did/How did the parallelism contribute to your reaction?
ReplyDeleteInteresting question from Jenny--maybe that will come forth in class. I agree that the story wouldn't have been told without the political tension (although western coming of age stories are so! fascinating). The parallelism you speak of has a weird way of creating more tension, which would normally not work that way.
ReplyDeleteThe world is different. NICE!
e
i feel like this memoir is so important because complex identities (who do not support the people in power, who are not strictly religious, who are exposed to other cultures) are never brought to light in the US. unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteI agree with how useful it is to learn about the political situation in Iran through the eyes of a child. I think another element to add to everything you have said is that a child is so "innocent" that her voice cannot be contested (in the way that people would contest an adult memoir of someone living in Iran during the Cultural Revolution.