Persepolis 2:
Some folks had told me that Persepolis 2 isn’t nearly as
good as the first one, but I loved it. It really felt like a natural extension
of Persepolis 1, with the same graphic and narration styles and the same,
strong, author’s voice.
I was drawn into the early chapters of Marji growing into
her womanhood, which start around p35 where the panels show the changes in her
body. This reminds me of when I worked with middle school students because
their bodies really do grow at random proportions like that lol. I also loved
her exploration of “sexual liberation” in an Austrian context. I think, being
from an Indian family, in many ways I could relate to her explorations and
confusions around this. Its interesting. Marji’s character is always strong and
bold, the only time she appears confused, of low esteem and loses her boldness
is when she first moves to Austria (finding friends) and when she is confronted
with trying find her place in the dating scene.
I noticed some changes in the drawing style in Persepolis 2.
As the narrator explores her later years, growing into adulthood, her drawing
style is less creative. I think the part of her artwork that I enjoyed most in
Persepolis 1 was the way that her drawings invoked memories of my own childhood
imagination (ie – her drawing’s of God hugging her, laying out in the middle of
the black universe etc.) I didn’t find the same imaginative drawings in
Persepolis 2. I wonder if it was intentional, or if this just naturally changed
as her memories of her adulthood are probably much less imaginative. On p40 is
one of the most imaginative drawings in Persepolis 2 (where she shows us her
memories), but she doesn’t explore those memories, or play with them, or
enlarge them the way she did in her childhood. In this text, we explore Marji’s
internal world more through what she tells us in narration than images. The
only images that stand out as access points to her imaginary are p 64 when she
is tripping and p84 when she visually shows us the feel of her daily bus rides
in Austria.
I’m happy that in this text, Marji reconnects with her
faith. Her relationship to God isn’t as casual as it was in her childhood, it
seems its taken a sort of adulthood formality (prayer, instead of having tea
with God), but she reclaims a strong faith (starting on p129).
The book explores the idea of having a split identity
(Iranian in Austria and European in Iran) in a way that I didn’t expect. She
only spent a few years in Austria and I didn’t realize it would change her
sense of identity so much. I think because she spent such crucial years
(teenage, transformation years) and tried to grow into her womanhood abroad
that it really changed her sense of self. I liked the ending of this story. I
like that she finds a way to be a woman in her country (physically enjoys her
body), reconnects with her grandmother and even becomes social again. I think I
just let out big sighs when I saw her get healthy again. The author stays true
to herself after a divorce, the book ends with Marji’s at her best and
strongest. Loved it. With there was a Persepolis 3
Perhaps there will be a Persepolis 3. Note the ellipses in the final sentence...
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteThere were fewer of the Persepolis inspired, highly graphic war panels in 2 of course, as the battlefield of this portion of the book was an internal landscape. Satrapi has only herself to reinvent, redraw throughout, which, in the absence of the incredibly rich and tragic national events of Persepolis 1, I thought was highly creative. When the narrator became sick, Satrapi devotes a wallet sized panel to the evolution of her bronchial cough, for example.
I, too, missed the black and white world of magical realism of the child perspective...but I thought that the grown up envisioning of the collapsing embrace between grown up Marji and Reza was poignant and beautifully drawn.
The magic is lost as you and K say in the P2 because she is grappling with the power of independence. The drawing does indeed minimize the excitement of her life and flatten it to a less dynamic experience.
ReplyDeletenice
e