Monday, April 29, 2013

Drinking at the Movies


It's hard to pick out specific moments that I want to talk about for this book, because it was such an entertaining read that I just end up wanting to quote it. In a way, it resists being thought about too critically. Julia herself avoids taking herself and her problems too seriously. Every struggle that she goes through must be prefaced by an acknowledgement of her problems as largely inconsequential. In fact, in the first few pages of the book, Julia explains how her life in San Francisco was really great. She had a great apartment, great friends, a job that she "actually liked" and a boyfriend who "wasn't an asshole." She goes on to talk about why things weren't quite as they seemed- her life was actually hard in a lot of ways. I think that sort of acknowledgment of those who have it worse off, and that impulse to downplay your problems while also mentioning them is very contemporary. I notice it in the way people will casually say, "there are starving kids in Africa," and the Internet obsession with identifying first world problems as such.

I found it interesting in that regard how rather than talk directly about her problems, Wertz uses personification to animate her wallet and her brain (who she presents as her adversaries,) separately, to do the job. In other words, we as readers learn what Julia thinks of herself through witnessing how her brain, and later, her wallet interact with her. For instance, on page 95, Julia's brain escapes in order to inform her "for her own good," why she hasn't been on a date in years:  "A date!? Oh hell no. You hate dating. It's awkward, unpleasant, and you spend the whole time wishing you were at home watching 30 rock [...] you dress like a trashcan from 1996, you're a selfish fart who prefers to be alone rather than make the effort to cultivate meaningful relationships." Her brain goes on to reference her drinking problem in the next panel. Julia's wallet, it seems, also has a drinking problem. Aside from her wallet's habit of soliciting prostitutes, one could say that Julia's wallet (and her brain, who is also kind of an unsavory character) represents a reflection of the character of Julia, and actually says a lot about her as a person. While both the wallet and the brain are constantly trying to escape from Julia (in the way that perhaps she is trying to escape from herself,) and the anecdotes that Wertz tells revolve in both instances around either her wallet or her brain "making a run for it," (see "The Wayward Wallet" starting on page 183) Julia's booze sticks by her and never judges her.

All of this is emphasized by the last page, where Julia gives her readers an amusing update of the lives of a few of the characters in her memoir in a bit entitled, "Where Are They Now?" Julia provides glimpses into the lives of only minor characters, most of whom are politicians who she doesn't even know personally. She certainly doesn't reveal anything about herself, or about any efforts on her part to get sober. Julia Wertz avoids the usual truth-seeking that one tends to encounter in memoir, as demonstrated by her inability to cope with what it takes to stop drinking. She confronts her drinking problem in a myriad of ways throughout the book, but it's almost as if her character has to hope that acknowledging it is enough, at least for now, much in the same way that acknowledging her privilege makes it okay to write about her problems.

I hope some of that makes sense. I really loved this book, and can't wait to read more by Wertz, and also to discuss with you all on Tuesday!

5 comments:

  1. I take your point about the personification of her brain and wallet do the job of letting her talk about her problems (and I would add, shortcomings). I think this is brilliant because to do it herself, without these props, would make Wertz into a self-absorbed whiner that would alienate the reader. Plus it just wouldn't be funny.

    I also was bemused by the last page and cast of characters that made mention but I think it tells us a lot about Wertz' personality and character. Again to avoid sounding like a white-privilage whiner and to allow very good humor, she uses the device of "another" to demonstrate who she is--there is no mistaking how she feels about Dick Cheney but she never has to say, "I think he's an asshole," because she uses reporting (albeit made-up) to tell us what he's up to that is important for us to know--he's raping kittens...

    Darin

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that Wertz's propensity to deflect how difficult life is in comparison to third world countries is a contemporary tendency. I even kind of did it in my own blog post, comparing Drinking at the Movies to Persepolis. Also, personification of Wertz's personal objects is so telling. I hope we talk about that during class.
    -Trin

    ReplyDelete
  3. Her inclusion of politicians as characters in the memoir rendered them fodder (showed how they render themselves fodder). Much as she includes herself in the panels depicting/caricaturing people that she might see at night in New York (albeit problematically), she uses panel space to close the graphic distance between herself and Sarah Palin, Dick Cheney, etc. I wonder how her panel size, proportions, and shifting graphic style (sometimes within the same panel) distance her from and/or bring her into proximal complicity with political figures, even as she accentuates her complacency.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm glad you talked about this deflection Maggie and others --she hints at an edginess to her condition and/or personality that could spiral downward. If she cuts it off from herself, the disassociation, then it slows down the dip.
    e

    ReplyDelete
  5. "that sort of acknowledgment of those who have it worse off, and that impulse to downplay your problems while also mentioning them is very contemporary. I notice it in the way people will casually say, "there are starving kids in Africa," and the Internet obsession with identifying first world problems as such."

    I really like this observation. It's interesting to think about what signifiers we have now that will be picked out in the future as specific to our current times- if that makes sense...

    ReplyDelete