Are You My Mother?
Bechdel’s
relationship with her mother left just as many questions unanswered as with her
father, which admittedly made it easy to just want a straightforward answer or
reason. (But obviously, there would be no story that way.) Throughout the story
there’s a need for her to understand certain things about her mother in order to
understand herself and the story she’s trying to write. She spends a lot of the
story absorbed in herself, which she admits, and uses as a platform to begin
the process of figuring things out. Earning her mother’s approval is a key part
of her whole process, which seems doomed based upon the way she characterizes
the relationship with her. She appears to constantly be (either consciously or
unconsciously) withholding the kind of approval Bechdel needs, both in her own
life and with respect to her work. A good example of this apparently cold
refusal to grant approval is their patterns of communication. The scenes of
their phone conversations are interesting because they illustrate the extent of
the barrier that exists between them. Her mother will not engage with her past
a certain point, preferring to just spout off about anything and everything
save those things that are too personal. I kept wondering why she keeps
calling, if she’s not even comfortable telling her mother how she’s actually
doing. But then, the surface-level communication still allows her to have her
mother to herself, and to try to make something of their conversations on her
own terms by writing down every word. The scenes where Bechdel is sitting in
front of her computer with her mother on the line evoke both frustration and
loneliness. She sits there in her office, sort of desperate for a direction to
go in. She keeps talking to her mother, always hanging up no better off than
when she called. Pg. 28 provides a good illustration of this endless pursuit of
something more, for her art and for her connection to her mother. It’s snowing,
and the look on her face is almost blank from the burden of trying to “figure
out what the story is.” It’s clear that she doesn’t just mean a pattern of
events or instances in her life, but what the story is between the two of them.
The frame opposite of her office, on pg. 29, shows the other end of their phone
conversation- her mother, hearing her talk, and not much else. This image stood
out because the way that her mother is positioned in the room, surrounded by
her own interests and pursuits, and clearly not really listening to her
daughter, is really frustrating. Her mother, at least, looks in no hurry to
help Bechdel find the story between them. Figuring out the story is not the
same thing as helping to edit and give input to it. Her mother does not dismiss
her story, and in fact provides extensive notes. But Bechdel admits she
“skimmed them quickly, looking for her personal
response. Did she remember the time she stopped kissing me goodnight?”
Acknowledging the circumstances and not just the craft and “matters of style”
would mean a lot more, and are what she keeps waiting for. If her mother had
included some recognition of that moment, that in and of itself would have been
a step to legitimizing everything she’s trying to do. (Maybe her mother doesn’t
know the difference) All of this at certain points in the story makes their
relationship seem doomed to the cycle of wanting and needing and never being
fulfilled. For instance, the scene where she hangs up on her mother is the
first time she really reaches this resolution: “Whatever it was I wanted from
my mother was simply not there to be had. It was not her fault” (pg. 228). The
frustration she feels at resigning herself to the fact is visible. But then at
the same time, there is a shared “creative risk-taking” between them, which it
seems like her mother does in fact recognize (234). Their shared creativity is
similar to the way she and her father had a common struggle with their
sexuality. Her father chose a life that would suppress who he was, just as her
mother chose one that would prevent her from doing and being the things she
really wanted. In a way, Bechdel was freer on both accounts, and despite her
mother withholding things like hugs and “I love you’s,” she ultimately does
give her a way to live and express herself like she never could. Or at least,
that’s what I made of the last line. “A way out” seems like a very appropriate
resolution to reach.
What did you think of the split-panel conversations between Bechdel and her mother? At one point, a conversation progresses (or doesn't) between the two of them as they sit in the same positions in several panels, the scene split between two panels, then in one panel, and then split again (200-201). Does this show the impossible search for a stylized/Utopic/archetypal "wholeness" in a conversational dynamic that will always be fractured or never live up to archetypes (perhaps constructively so, painfully so, etc.)? Does the visual division of two people in the same room or on the same couch while communicating (on a mechanical level at least) illustrate your comment: "All of this at certain points in the story makes their relationship seem doomed to the cycle of wanting and needing and never being fulfilled"?
ReplyDeleteFrom the split panel scenes (200-201) I got the same sense that Bechdel was sort of still left without the connection she was looking for. Maybe you're right- in a lot of ways it does appear to be an "impossible search for a stylized/utopic/archetypal wholeness." I think Bechdel used the split frames to acknowledge this to the reader, like she knows it's never going to be what she imagines. And the black space almost says it on its own, from their body language to the looks on their faces.
DeleteGreat post Lucy and i think the phone conversations are so representational because they are never face to face--Jenny brings up a good point about when she decides to actually put her mother in the scene. Mostly we're focusing, as you point out, her positioning the the frame and there's a kind of acceptance of her authority.
ReplyDeleteExcellent examples too.
e