Head-body ratios fluctuate in Special Exits, and the proportions of bodily extremities to torsos
sometimes make parts of characters seem closer to readers than the placement of
their bodies in relation to furniture would otherwise suggest. The unusual sizing of the body parts and
bodies in relation to their surroundings help account for tensions that the
text raises and cannot resolve because of the relatively early stage of grief
in which it ends. Certain uncertainties
cannot be adequately answered, and centering out-of-proportion figures and
parts allows the panels to hold these anxieties rather than superficially “tying
up loose ends.” These are “exits,” after
all, and not endings, per se.
When weighing her options with the Hospice workers,
Laura’s head makes the rest of her body seem smaller, as she cringes, crosses
her right arm over her waist, and presses her legs together tightly (Farmer
175). She is shrinking herself out of
the panel, but her unresolved dilemma about her father’s care is central, ballooning
her head: “Tough choice, that!” All eyes
are on her, and she looks away from readers and people in the panel, her left
hand fingers pushing up against her tight-lipped, tense mouth as she asks, “Can
we get some physical therapy for him?” The
answer leaves her just as tense; there is no unambiguous choice in decisions about
her father’s care. The consequences take
up space in the panel by engorging her brain so that one part of her takes up
more space than the rest of her physical presence, which she diminishes
visually while taking care of her father towards the very end of his life. Even her facial expressions remain stylized
and have less range than those of her parents; a level of compromise happens
when she cares for them, and the memoir centers her parents’ character
development. Her head has to be full of
thoughts but those thoughts can’t all leak out because they might overtake the
focus of Special Exits, as her out-of-proportion
head threatens to overtake some panels.
Similarly, the nurses’ judgmental expressions seem
larger-than-life, although their bodies have a sort of stylized proportionality
(Farmer 141). In fact, their bodies must
take up an unusual but not a larger space than their faces because their body
language conveys just as much judgment: they overhear the conversation about
how/if/when Lars hurt Rachel. Standing
in for readers’ unanswered questions about the stress of caring for a loved one
and the possibility of abuse, they reproach Laura and Lars in the hallway,
glaring at them with unresolved anger that the text never resolves. In the center of the panel, they raise
ambivalent responses to Lars, complicating the empathy that the text may
engender for him.
Laura’s feet and head seem closer to readers than
Ching, although Ching sits just in front of Laura’s chair and her footrest, the
cat’s tail touching the carpet, which is closest to readers in relation to the
background and foreground of the panel (Farmer 200). Background and foreground seem delineated by
a vase on a table near the wall as the farthest point visible in the background,
in front of which is a chair, in front of which is Laura’s chair and her footstool
(slightly closer to the foreground than that chair), Ching, and the carpet at
the bottom and lower right corner of the panel.
Granted, Ching is an itty bitty feline, but Laura’s foot, her magazine, and
her head seem just his size. Overtaken
by Laura and objects in the panel, Ching seems to be shrinking out of the
narrative, as does any richly detailed home décor detail. Meanwhile, the rest of Laura’s body seems relatively
proportionate to the chair and footstool.
Both chairs are about the same size, although Laura’s seems closer
(judging by its placement on the floor) to readers than the wooden chair near
the back wall. However, the back wall is
vague, illuminated as much by seemingly random shadows as by the light that
seems to come from multiple points in the panel. Neither light, proportions, or object
placement in the panel can anchor the images therein. In contrast, most earlier panels feature
densely shadowed, textured backgrounds, particularly the kitchen and living
room of Lars and Rachel’s home. Ching
takes up more space and is only slightly off-center in the final panel, similar
to his position in that page’s first panel, when he jumps the fence (Farmer
200). Clawing and cuddling Laura in the
final panel, as she exclaims, “Dad!
Dad! Can you see this?!” the cat
seems to represent Laura’s stage of grief: she accepts the loss of her father,
and she is letting go, but she seeks an ongoing connection with his
memory. The cat escapes, returns out of
anxiety (and possibly dog-related injury), and claw-cuddles Laura; his
departure is bittersweet, tense, characterized by conflict (“Bark?,” “Mee
Yow!,” Woof?,” etc.) and incomplete. Ching leaves only temporarily; Laura has not
quite reached a point where her father’s “exit” seems permanent. Nonetheless, Ching’s continual shrinking in
the middle panels on the page and the cat’s character shift at the end (Ching
may grudgingly offer Laura affection) offer a potential for gradual letting-go,
albeit one that claws as much as it embraces.
I too had problems with the way that the illustrations were portrayed and proportioned. At times I felt it "worked" but at other times I found it to be extremely distracting and took me away from the flow of the text so that I may contemplate about the meaning of the illustration. Glad you posted this, that way I know I'm not just crazy :)
ReplyDeleteJenny,
ReplyDeletegreat illustration of the illustrations. The exaggeration of certain body parts seemed almost caricature like at times and i wonder if Farmer had intended it. They felt kind of animate. It's an interesting writing style from an comics pioneer.
e
I wonder if the proportions had anything to do with Farmer showing how people can lose control over their body parts and how when we care for other's bodies, we fall out of our bodies sometimes, we stop caring for our basic needs. An enlarged head could be an unnamed pounding headache, for example.
ReplyDeleteCool blog, thanks