Hi All,
I apologize for my late blog but yesterday I was suffering
from a terrible, debilitating migraine. I don’t know if any of you have ever
had one of these but basically they suck and for me at least, it’s rare that
any amount of medicine helps. All I can do it try and sleep with the lights out
and in total silence (which is near to impossible with two kids lol). Well,
anyway, here is my blog for this week. Thank you for your understanding.
I don’t expect that many of you know this but I am a librarian
at my daughter’s school and Are You My
Mother? happened to land on the week that we celebrate Dr. Seuss’ birthday
(it’s March 2nd). After reading to 14 classes things like The Sneetches, The Lorax and Horton Hears a
Who it was incredibly difficult to not make the comparison, constantly. I
started this book wondering if she was ever going to make a connection to the title
with the Dr. Seuss book, Are you my
Mother? Although she never explicitly makes this connection, she does
however provide the reader with insight into perhaps the thinking of how this
title came about. On pages 132-133 Bechdel provides the reader with a double
page, full spread display of the analysis of how her memories of reading Dr.
Seuss’ Sleep Book has crept back into
her daily life. She provides example of
“plexiglass dome” term to explain her mother and the incessant daily
recording to show how it not only influenced her as a child, but now also as an
adult. In many ways, Bechdel has now provided us with a bridge to understanding
why she titled the book as she did. Perhaps it is simply a childhood memory of
a book that she either so closely identified with or is now simply influencing
her in her adult years.
In addition to the title, I found it incredibly difficult
not to connect some of Bechdel’s illustrations throughout Are You My Mother? to some of Dr. Seuss’ own illustrations. For
example, the color usage within the illustration is very similar to that found
in Horton Hears a Who (and many
others). In both of these books, tones of just black and white are used along
with a singular “other color”. In Are You
My Mother? this color is red. Within Horton
Hears a Who this color is blue. So, as you can tell it was very difficult
for me not to make these sorts of connections. I think she did this for two
possible reasons. First, if she did this in a sort of unconscious way, it would
further support her given argument throughout the book surrounding the
influences of childhood, repression and such. It displays how her childhood
experiences influence her still as a middle-aged adult. Second, if she did this
as a conscious choice, it would simply allow for her to display, with one
title, how a childhood book influenced her and spoke to her both as a child and
as an adult. For anyone who has read the Dr. Seuss version of Are you my Mother? they would be able to
immediately understand perhaps the emptiness or feelings of constantly
searching that Bechdel had towards her mother.
Things that I had difficulty with or questions about include
the following: First, why the decision to start every chapter with a dream? Not
only just a dream, but also with the blackout pages. Why? At first I thought
simply that the blacked out pages were a way for her to indicate, as she does
with the use of squiggly dialogue bubbles, a difference in the text or the
source of information. In this case, it would be simply to indicate that she is
dreaming. But as I read on, I realized that to some extent this was not the
case because she also ends every chapter with the black pages. When she ends
the chapter with the black pages it does not appear that she is dreaming. There
are also times when she is dreaming throughout a chapter and she again utilizes
the black pages. It made me think and perhaps I can get some fresh perspective
on it in class. Second, I had such a hard time following all the juxtaposition
of the psychology and psychoanalytical jargon, references, etc. I felt almost
put off by it, as if I oddly felt that this sort of thing had no space in a
narrative. It was something that I had rarely felt, though I have rarely
encountered this “type” of narrative or novel. I understand that it has a place
in Bechdel’s life but why so much? It almost reminded me of a sort of stream of
consciousness thing where while she wrote this memoir and staying true to her
train of thought she makes constant connections to Woolf, Freud, etc. It was
somewhat hard to follow and really make those connections, at least for me. In
addition to this, I had difficultly following her non-linear sections of the
book. Overall, the memoir seemed somewhat linear but she went back and forth,
in dreams, to her childhood, recalling memories in therapy, etc. I found this a
bit confusing and wondering why she chose to make these sorts of decisions.
Perhaps, as I said before she wanted to stick to a sort of stream of
consciousness type of feel throughout the book and felt it stayed true to her
memory and train of thought. I can appreciate that, though as I said, I found
myself backtracking a few times just to understand where I was at “in the
story”.
Forgot about the Sleep book, this was one of my favorite pages and when I read it I sent one of our classmates an email saying how much I loved this book... I especially love how she included this important childhood book in her psychoanalysis. The Sleep book is not a story, but it does contain a lot of odd and mind expanding concepts that I believe, with repetition can change a person. Especially as children read and re-read the same books, and parents have so much to do with what those books ARE. As a parent and librarian you are all over that I'm sure. Anyway, I also appreciate what you are saying about the linearity of the story, and how it seems to drive things forward, while at the same time becoming necessarily confused, as all of the impinging narratives clutter the page. I'm not sure what the alternative could be, but it is true that Bechdel is trying to maintain a journalistic integrity to an experience that requires a lot of random and Seussian wandering...
ReplyDeleteI got alot of the Seuss images and color usage in her book. When I got to the large images that you refer to, I had that "ah ha!" moment. Books were such a large part of Alison's growing up (as in my childhood), that I appreciated her homage to Dr Seuss all the more.
ReplyDeleteI, too, had to really stick it out with the back-and-forth with Alison's life stories interspersed with visits to therapists. Too much psychology in the book and not enough of HER story with her relationship with her mother.
Bummer about migranes, I've had those. Nasty.
I'm so glad you pointed out the Dr. Seuss connections because the only one I initially saw was the plexiglass dome page.
ReplyDeleteI also questioned the decision to start each chapter with a dream. I know she was trying to tie that to psychoanalysis, but I couldn't help remembering that once someone told me that nobody is interested in the dreams of others (unless they are included in the dreams). I understood that sentiment because I did not find the dreams particularly interesting. I think that idea can be expanded to include therapy, too. I'm not sure people are generally interested in the therapy of others, unless it's to someone with whom they are close.
Well one of my big questions is why end with a dream? i get the cyclical stuff but is it a sign of progress or digression? Nice work audra, head ache and all. I am glad that you seussed it since she goes for the bolder points there.
ReplyDeletee
I really appreciate the connections you make to the Dr. Seuss books, I too absolutely forgot about that page spread. It's interesting that Bechdel's psychology discussions were somewhat preventative for you, as I felt the total opposite even without a strong psychology background. It gave me some sort of alternate perspective of understand what Bechdel was understanding of her mother, since she was unable to understand (or possibly connect in the way that she wanted with) her mother on just her own terms. Many of these psychologists discuss the importance of dreams in their texts as well, so maybe this was a way for her to write her own psychological/psychoanalytical text without being scientific?
ReplyDelete