In the six “I traveled
more” panels, color spills over sparse lines, creating a sense of imperfect,
hazy memory. Visual (rather cliché or hegemonic-ish)
metonyms for places replace detail: India is yoga and a particular style of
architecture, Mexico is a beach, and Egypt is a camel, a head-covering, sand
dunes, and pyramids (paging Edward Said).
Uncolored white paper gaps poke through the intermingling colors,
imitating watercolor blurring or a badly developed photograph: memory is, as most responses have already mentioned,
a process of reconstruction, by no means ahistorical (i.e. outside of
signifiers from 19th Century European and Anglo-American travel
writing, Rick Steves’ videos, National
Geographic, etc.).
More generally, white, uneven
gaps between colors and color-line spillage shows up in panels that retell Sandell’s
father’s stories, panels of dialogue (or monologue) between her father and her,
and (to a lesser extent) panels with Ben and her. For example, on pages 66-67, the white spaces
highlight Sandell’s father’s word bubbles.
Lines seem distinct and color seems self-contained when Sandell is
immersed in her father’s storytelling, yet his words seem encompassed in a
porous word cloud (rather than a clear-cut bubble). His stories seem to have no limits; the
mythos surrounding them (the white space) overshadows the words
themselves. Boundaries between her father’s
words and her own sense of self seem unfixed; his stories (the white space) overtake
the other colors so that his story almost takes the place of external setting. They could sit on any chair, couch, floor,
piece of ground (all of which fade into the background), and his stories would
become “the” story, complementing Sandell’s assertion that her own voice
becomes a medium for his. For example,
she tells his stories to “bond with men” (Sandell 61). When Sandell tells her father’s stories to
celebrities and to Ben, when his stories are the central part of her
self-narrative, white space extends outside of the word bubbles (Sandell
104-105, 108-109, 125). White space
visually connects Sandell and her father as “like” when it illuminates both
father and daughter’s faces as she listens to his stories. Her own white-spilling (or white
lie-spilling) word bubbles reinforce this effect.
When she believes in or
suspends disbelief for his stories, colors and lines shore up, and both
characters seem more hermetically sealed, presenting an illusion that people
can be intact and their stories truthful in a certain sense. At these moments, the tightness of the color
enclosure seems to either give sway to her father’s (or her own) indulgence in full-fledged
persona or to suggest the idyllic wholeness that she experiences when she
accepts his stories as they are. As she
questions his stories, this same rigid color encapsulation within each figure
or object seems to shut out other elements, an attempt to separate the truth
from fiction and self from father, the “present” setting with the omnipresent
settings of her father’s stories.
(86-87, 127, 143, 146-147, 150-152).
A few word bubbles that
don’t leak white show up at moments of stability, as when the family moves frequently,
a pattern of movement that Sandell can count on, even if also brings up feelings
of instability or plants doubts about her father’s livelihood (Sandell 29). As Sandell approaches sobriety or has moments
wherein the consequences of her substance use become stark to her, the white
gaps around word bubbles sometimes become slightly more symmetrical and even, in
the spacing between the lines, other colors, and the white spaces (204). Exceptions such as uneven white lines around
word bubbles and images may illustrate Sandell’s thoughts, in-between
intoxication and uncomfortably sober realization, such as those realizations
about her sex life with Ben (Sandell 132-135).
In panels that feature denial about alcohol, Ambien, and the efficacy of
therapy, white spaces are clear but uneven lines (Sandell 200). What do pastel green, blue, purple, etc.
blocks around words do, when they sit on white space, all surrounding narrative
box text? Is there any significance to
the shift in color palette from pastel to dreary earth tones (lack of sobriety,
uncomfortable moments of sobriety before full sobriety, end to a relationship,
liminal space/life transitions, etc.)?
Great Jenny to see the tracking of the colors and the use of space and you do a great job of isolating the moments. Which is a lot of work. The emotional content comes loaded into our senses without this cognizance so it's helpful to have your thorough explication.
ReplyDeletee
Wow, yes, very impressive analysis. It has been so helpful for me to see the rigorous and intense "reading" of the graphics by so many in the class. I work in a graphics-focused field (cartography) and teach color theory and page-layout, yet so much of what you found here did not even occur to me--showing me how much I have to learn (to study) about the graphic memoir. As I read the book, the graphics were mere background that I wrote off as extraneous and "filler" and I see now how I did not do the book justice and owe this book and our future reading much more diligence. Thanks for the lesson!
ReplyDeleteDarin
Jenny: I really appreciate your post and your citations. Your post serves as a lecture on this book, a travel guide for the Imposter's Daughter. Most of what you addressed I hadn't thought of, but I am particularly interested in the questions you posed at the end and wonder what your responses to them are. Based on your reading, I'm gonna buy a ticket to the train that's headed toward saying all this was intentional.
ReplyDeleteSandell had a colorist; how do you think this impacts the text?