A previous post had mentioned the downward slope of the
lines in this short memoir and I am so glad that they did because I was without
explanation for why this piece made me feel so sad and weary. It’s almost like
when you watch a Tim Burton feel you know you’re going to feel creepy, dark and
perhaps as if you just came off an acid trip. This memoir definitely uses line
to create the tone. Everything seems sad and droopy throughout the panels. Even
some of the text appears to be down. One thing that is great about this
feature, I believe is that it really allows for the illustrator to capture
movement. All the illustrations where it would be safe to assume that there is
some sort of movement taking place, the line choice and apparently the stroke,
allows for movement to be properly captured. For example, throughout the
depictions of fields and the blades of dried grass, I can see the movement, I
can see the wind pushing those blades of grass and it’s pretty amazing for the
illustrator to be able to do this.
One thing I question in regard to line choice is whether it
was intended to make the viewer/reader feel so down and somewhat empty. I feel
that perhaps that is the way Lucy feels and is depicted throughout this short
memoir. If the intention was to impress some of that emotion on the reader
through this choice, I can definitely say it was successful. I felt her
emptiness, her loneliness.
I thought it rather creative and superb that the author was
able to create her own panels. It was the author/illustrators ultimate decision
to create the space in which the events took place. There are times when there
are no panels and I enjoyed that variation. There are also times when dialogue
or pictures bleed into other panels or the gutter and again, I though it was
very ingenious of the author to be able to take this kind of control of the
story and space. She also takes this kind of vivid control when she places the
“But I Can’t” 7 or so panels in. She is ultimately controlling when the story
begins. These features definitely place the authors power to the forefront of
the readers mind.
Lastly, and along the same lines of the authors executive
power of created her own space and panels, or lack there of, I wonder if the
way in which the panels are aligned was intended to somewhat confuse the reader
about the order in which they should be read. I know that various other graphic
memoirs, or depictions take advantage of this benefit and I wonder if that is
the case here as well. In other words, was it intentional that there was no
real indication of the direction in which the panels should be read? Or perhaps
I am just thinking too much into this and it is just assumed that the reader
will follow the natural direction of reading, from left to right.
Good questions about framing order and I wonder some of the same. Once I let go of trying to figure out a scheme and just went with it, it flowed perfectly. This is the genius of the artist: that tension can be "drawn" into the piece through the undefined structure and will leave me wandering but still finding my way, which is evocative of the narrator's journey through memory.
ReplyDeleteDarin
Audra,
ReplyDeletethere is a significant contrast between the line stroke and the color of the backgrounds. We have these easter egg colors, someone mild, almost cheery, punctuated with the declining line. Good observations
e